Which is a negative consequence of using DNA technology in forensics? While the technology itself has many benefits, it can also have a downside. Those who use it are faced with an important decision about whether or not they should use it.
DNA testing technology is the process of utilizing a sample of DNA from a crime scene or elsewhere to determine the identity of the person in question. This technology is widely used by law enforcement personnel for a variety of reasons. It can be useful in determining if a suspect is in fact who they say they are. It can also be used to rule out the possibility that a sample is a match to another sample.
There are a number of advantages to using this technology. One of those advantages is fast and accurate results. Because the sample is from a crime scene, the sample will be collected and sent to a lab. The lab will run a variety of tests on the sample to determine what type of DNA it contains. The faster the samples can be tested the less likely it is that another person other than the suspect will match the sample to something.
Another advantage to DNA testing is the ability to collect the sample from a crime scene without the permission of the person in question. A DNA swab test is also an option for collecting the DNA. This process is much like a fingerprint search. The police can collect the swab and send it off to a lab. If the results from the test are positive then the police can obtain a court order for the evidence.
Many people wonder what the cost implications are of using this type of forensics technology. In the past the cost of this testing was prohibitive. However, with new software, companies have been able to provide more affordable sample testing services. As a result, the cost of using this technology for the collection and analysis have dropped dramatically.
What about the problem of DNA being required in order to match a sample to a person? The answer to that question is the negative consequence of using DNA technology in forensics. Because the DNA samples are so diluted, it is not possible to actually hold the DNA in your hand and touch it. This means that if you are a suspect in a case, the only way to obtain the DNA is to have your DNA tested by a testing company. Therefore, any DNA samples obtained by police from suspects are extremely diluted.
How is a DNA test used to determine whether or not a person is guilty of a given crime? Although this is the most commonly asked question, there are actually many more. For instance, what about a blood test, fingerprint, or even a bite mark comparison. All of these methods can be used as evidence in a court case when criminal charges are filed against someone, but it helps to know which is a negative consequence of using DNA technology in forensics.
The final thing to know is what a positive consequence of using DNA technology in forensics is. In short, there is no way to catch everyone who has ever committed a crime, which is why criminals tend to move on to other crimes before they are caught. The same is true for law enforcement, which is why criminal databases rarely contain samples from every crime scene that they investigate. If a DNA sample is found on a crime scene, the sample will be tested and then compared to samples in the national crime database, to ensure that matches between the two are indeed a match.